Covid 19 managed to reveal the hypocrisy but also the effectiveness of the tools available to governments and businesses to control our every move. Various forms of surveillance have been violating our privacy for decades, despite the adoption of "strong privacy laws" in Europe.
In 2018 we acquired him GDPR as an added protection to our online privacy. Two years later it turns out that laws exist only to distract us, and that our personal privacy simply no longer exists.
Everything started to get a little clearer with the data protection regulations, which were first introduced in Europe in 2006 for "our good." Governments have taken advantage of the need for counter-terrorism protection, and dealt a fatal blow to privacy.
The mass surveillance regulations you found scattered across the EU in 2000 were more prevalent in some post-Soviet countries. These regulations, however, were found unconstitutional, but they existed as the memories of the Berlin Wall were still alive.
The EU Data Protection Directive 2006, however, opened the door to various types of surveillance, financial monitoring, censorship and privacy restrictions for more protection for a "greater good".
In 2014, the EU Data Conservation Directive was convicted by the Court of Justice of the European Union, Europe's highest court, because it was essentially a huge "mass surveillance".
The repeal of the EU directive did not invalidate national legislation implementing the same regulations with minimal variation at country level, although the Supreme Court described these laws as "a tool of mass surveillance." These laws are still enforced by the majority of EU countries years after this Supreme Court ruling.
Similarly, the mass collection of fingerprints and biometric population measurements have become the norm through an "innocent directive" for new ID cards (EU Regulation 2252/2004). PDF).
Let's not forget the video footage from the cameras or the real-time financial surveillance, which are also necessary for our "good" as they help to police traffic violations, and to combat any money laundering. Even before the Covid 19 pandemic, it was a matter of time, because governments want to monitor our every move.
True, how successful has been the massive surveillance we have had in the EU since the turn of the century on terrorist attacks, or unauthorized entry into the EU or the fight against money laundering.
Then came the GDPR to save us.
Many believed that "data protection", which is an advanced form of privacy, was now in good hands.
Some have already begun to recognize how GDPR it exists only for the benefit of industry and multinationals, but it also exists as a stepping stone to small business.
In view of the above, if one is surprised to see governments around the world suddenly discover all the means to monitor and investigate Covid 19 cases, one probably did not pay attention when needed.
Apart from surveillance drones, no new (visible) surveillance instruments were invented. All of the above will be used to monitor Covid 19: Location monitoring, biometric data processing and any telephone device have become important aids to any government. All this is known and now very easily accepted even in countries with a long democratic history.
In most countries, only minor amendments to the laws to introduce Covid 19 surveillance are sufficient. It is our new normal, since privacy is no longer a problem or even a "nuisance" for most.
In Europe, all this is happening with the consent of the EU bureaucrats to protect our privacy. The EU's leading privacy regulator - the European Data Protection Council in a statement posted on 19 March 2020, he mentioned that "A state of emergency can legitimize restrictions on freedoms provided that the restrictions are proportionate and limited to the period of emergency."
Can it legitimize? In what kind of emergency, who can establish anything and for how long? Surely Mr Orban in Hungary is very pleased to have gained this power, legally.
The scope of data collection due to Covid 19 is awe-inspiring, but rest assured - everything is done only for public health and successful quarantine.
With the regulation of Digital Services and the Revision of the Directive on the security of networks and information systems (NIS Directive) already included in the European Commission's Q4 2020 agenda, it would not be surprising to see further efforts to (de) regulate encryption or eliminate any anonymous use of communications or payment tools.
We should not worry, since we have nothing to hide, right?
Even before the Covid 19 state of emergency, blatant privacy breaches did not require any extreme investigation.
THE GDPR distributed some fines (disproportionate to the profits of large companies) and even left the right of appeal, so as not to pay the full amount. Individual rights to protect oneself from privacy violations were left to GDPR, while government powers to police offenses have been extended.
The Covid 19 pandemic clearly shows the limits of this approach, as there no longer seem to be any obstacles to the complete collapse of privacy. The fear of the public is the best ally, like the fear of a possible terrorist attack, which may never happen.
The current situation can lead us to results we do not want to know. However, many still support this approach while still supporting it GDPR like the future of our privacy.