Facebook will fight COVID-19 misinformation more directly by sending alerts to users who like, share or comment on a removed post with misinformation.
Facebook will send alerts directly to users who like, share or comment on COVID-19 posts that violate the company's terms of service.
This new setting will work as follows: if a user has interacted with a post to be removed, Facebook will send a notification to the user telling them that the post has been removed. If the user clicks on the alert, they will be taken to a landing page with a screenshot of the post and a brief explanation of why it was removed. The landing page will also include links to educational websites for COVID-19, and will urge him not to follow the team that published it.
This setting is an extension of Facebook's previous efforts to combat misinformation. Prior to that, the company had displayed a banner in the news feed, urging users involved with removed content to "help their friends and family by avoiding fake Covid-19 information".
Facebook's modified approach comes almost a year after the pandemic began. Notifications will not be sent to deleted posts.
Read them Technology News from all over the world, with the validity of iGuRu.gr
Follow us on Google News
iPhone 6s crashes from a plane, records its descent and survives
»
Do we see any baths "stay home" soon?
And I do not ask about havale but because the style of the text, while it had the potential to lead the reader's thought to: "interventions in the mind", tries to lead to: I am a hare for what comes to you.
I do not hide that for a long time Jimako has gathered, observing. And maybe that is the reason for not sending various.
George, I remind you that the marriage that was attempted a few years ago with "somethingnews" did not have the desired result. And the split brought good results. So, do you have to think about certain issues, before changing anything that had a target group for those who were not interested in what the "stevzobsphone" records falling from space?
Good morning to those of us who are observant to those we read and "insomnia", but only to make fun of the endless neophile's stupidity of "anonymous commentators".
the target group does not exist, it would exist if we tried to put in the bank in addition to paying the server, We continue in bulk on the wave even if they say that we are biased or that we have an opinion. The view whether it exists has a place and value, even if it provokes controversy