Boeing 737 Max returns but some disagree

The Boeing 737 Max has been stuck for almost two years. But the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said last week it was fit to fly. Again.

American Airlines had already foreseen this. He had scheduled flights with the plane from December 29 on the Miami-La Guardia route. If you look closely, the airline states that this flight will take place with Max.

However, 346 people have lost their lives with this particular plane. The so-called Maneuvering Characteristics Augmentation System was the software that accidentally pushed the nose of the plane down, and the pilots could not turn it off as it sent the plane down.

Obviously, at the moment everything is working fine.

However, the FAA admitted that when he first certified the plane he simply did not see the flaws in the software. He now accuses "communication between flight tests and Boeing operations teams and between Boeing and the FAA". But right now everything seems to be fine.

But not everyone is equally optimistic.

American pilots are worried that the training program for this feature is not good enough. They are worried that they may not remember all the steps that need to be taken to keep the plane safe in an emergency.

There are also the principles. Usually, they accept the decision of the authority from the country of manufacture of the aircraft. However, regulators in Europe, Brazil and Canada are less optimistic about Max.

The Canadian regulatory authority, Transport Canada, Reported"There will be differences between what the FAA has approved today and what Canada will demand. These differences will include additional deck and pre-flight procedures. ”

Of course US airlines would like to use Max. Or maybe not; One of its main features is that it is 20% more fuel efficient. Airlines need more money today than ever before.

But United Airlines is not in such a hurry. Insists that each of the 14 Max needs 1.000 hours of work before it is considered ready to start the routes.
Southwest CEO Gary Kelly also said: "A lot of work needs to be done to restart the Max aircraft, which we estimate will take place in the second quarter of 2021 at the latest."

The airline also reports that some of its customers they are not satisfied with the prospect of flying with Max. And this is from the airline that already has 34 Max, more than any other US airline.

And what about the customers? Last year, one concluded that over 50% of customers said they would not fly with Max again. One or two airlines seem to be hiding the Max name in order to avoid the issue. Southwest, on the other hand, he says that she is proud of that particular plane.

Last week, the consumer groups Business Coalition, Consumer Action, Consumer Federation of America, National Consumers League and Travel Fairness Now pressed airlines to commit to a five-point plan that formalizes consumer rights when booking at Max.

Some think this is all hysteria. Some pilots insist there were no Max incidents in the US before they were banned, so that should be . They say that have seen them before with the DC-10, which was banned in 1979 and then became a success.

However, the DC-10 was banned for two months, not 20. In addition, with the Max 346, people have died in two separate accidents.

Max has become a symbol of a system gone wrong – and not just a software system. The airplane has become an example, some say, of what happens when accountants take over a universe of tasks and impose the them in everything. It has become an example, for some, of too much coziness between Boeing and regulators.

But there is no room for misfortune or misunderstanding when the whole world is watching.

iGuRu.gr The Best Technology Site in Greecefgns

every publication, directly to your inbox

Join the 2.086 registrants.

Written by giorgos

George still wonders what he's doing here ...

Leave a reply

Your email address is not published. Required fields are mentioned with *

Your message will not be published if:
1. Contains insulting, defamatory, racist, offensive or inappropriate comments.
2. Causes harm to minors.
3. It interferes with the privacy and individual and social rights of other users.
4. Advertises products or services or websites.
5. Contains personal information (address, phone, etc.).