Long Term Support or Rolling Release? Below we will see differences and maybe some myths about a big issue of users who choose Linux. Long Term Support or Rolling Release? Who needs long support and who selects roll-out?
Let's start with LTS. They are the versions used by servers and machines in general production. These distributions use older stable kernels, offering the reliability that businesses and servers demand. Of course they can also be used by ordinary users who are not interested in the latest technology. 
Note that if a new release is released (say in popular Ubuntu Long Term Support, no one can say for sure that if you upgraded your system it will not crash.) You will usually need to make a fresh installation to make sure that your system will work.
The good thing in the above scenario is that you can install Ubuntu for example and forget the upgrades for 5 years. But if you're in Windows and you're thinking about changing to Linux, that's not something you should be worried about. I bet you will need to make a new installation before the distribution support time is over.
Why
Of course because we learn from Mistakes us. But even if you don't make mistakes it is very likely that you will change distribution after a while as the technology moves and you might see something that will pique your interest.
As for the misunderstood Rolling distributions, a lot is "heard" on the internet. According to "experts" of earlier times, Rolling releases do not offer stability to the end user like "armored" Long Term Support distributions. It may still apply to novice users, and certainly certainly more so in the past for novice and experienced users due to innovation. Rolling distribution, however, does not mean testing a fixed one. Every rolling distribution and especially the OpenSUSE Tumbleweed διαθέτουν πακέτα και γενικότερα ένα λειτουργικό system which before being released to the public has been thoroughly tested and many times over. Yes the “dangerous” version of OpenSUSE is Factory if you really want to believe the experts who are against rolling distributions.
But let's be realistic:
Which beginner will install it Arch Linux; Probably no one. The most likely scenario is a first experience with Ubuntu, or Mint, that even with these distributions bugs and reinstalls lurk.
I have been using 3 for years on different distributions on 2 computers. Manjaro, Fedora and OpenSUSE Tumbleweed. Two out of three distributions are rolling out but all three use cutting edge software, the latest one to be released.
Well if you do not "play" with your system trying new things and the above three distributions will not present you with any problems (the same goes for beginners with Windows). And because the devil is in the details, all three distributions (like most large ones) have communities that will answer your question, even if you never do.
So Long Term Support distributions are not "long term distributions." According to the above, a rolling distribution of these two that we mentioned will perfectly serve your needs and in fact with the latest technology.
Long Term Support or Rolling; the decision is yours. If you have a different point of view, please "listen" to it from the comments of the post ..
