Mark Zuckerberg or not: When the Brook Mahealani Lee (Hawaii) Miss Universe in 1997, was asked: "If there was no rule in your life for a day, and you could do something outrageous, what would you do?"
He answered: “I would eat everything in the world. You do not understand, I would eat everything from two times".
Some say Lee's response perfectly describes his outrageous hunger Mark Zuckerberg for global dominance in recent years.
And yet he is still here, comfortably answering policy questions in America and in Europe .. After its scandal Cambridge Analytica, Mr. Mark Zuckerberg finally had to admit that Facebook's commitment to protection της ιδιωτικής ζωής και για την better safety, it was a very big bubble. A bubble that burst…
But what do security professionals think?
They also adopt the logical thought that the CEO of Facebook should resign for the obviousscamsecurity protocols?
Below we will see one research (PDF) that surveyed 759 security professionals about Facebook and its problems. The survey was carried out at the RSA Conference last month by company AlienVault security. One of the questions asked if Zuckerberg should be fired.
38 percent wanted to be fired. This means that 62% did not think it was right, to the great relief of Mark Zuckerberg, who definitely wants to keep the chair (for new adventures).
Seventy-five percent of security gurus said they wanted more government regulation on social media platforms to limit how sites like Facebook could use their customers' data for commercial purposes.
Τι γίνεται όμως με τον GDPR, τον ευρωπαϊκό κανονισμό για την προστασία των δεδομένων; Το 69% δήλωσε ότι τάσσεται υπέρ της καθιέρωσής του και στις USA.
Let's go back to Facebook: How many of the security professionals who are concerned have deleted their accounts?
18 percent said they had already deleted or never had a Facebook account. As for the latest problems, 16% said they had recently deleted their accounts.
Conclusion: If security professionals still don't have a clear picture of who should be held responsible in a security breach there is a problem. The researchers blamed the board of directors, the CEO and the Security Officer at the same time.
This chaos, on the other hand there are many who enjoy it: The intelligence services of the USA, Russia, the China or any state with advanced IT departments waiting around the corner.
This is the problem with security. Ignorance, irresponsibility, chaos, delay in transmitting information so as not to expose any company, and the absence of control mechanisms shape the space where mice dance (safely).
_____________________
- Google's DeepMind: dopamine use from neural networks
- BFF: No will not save you on Facebook. It's a hoax
