Microsoft sues Office for 70.000 license hijacking

It's no secret that Windows and Office are two of the most pirated software on the market at the moment. So Microsoft shows its mood by filing lawsuits each time it manages to locate a company or a person involved in the sale or distribution of fake copies of its products.

microsoft pirated flag

This time the Microsoft sued an Arizona-based electronics recycling company, arguing that its employees have stolen and distributed 70.000 copies of Office 2010 on the black market.

A bizjournals report states that Microsoft claims for the cost of the Office licenses they deserve dollars from the US District Court for Western Washington.

In the lawsuit, Microsoft states that the company's owners, Danny and Gary Kirkpatrick, were supposed to supervise the workers and the των αδειών λογισμικού της Microsoft από .

The contract between the two companies (Micrsoft and a recycling company that is also the end customer) has been violated, so Microsophile argues that the two owners of the company are now responsible for approximately 70.000 licenses ending up in the black market.

A total of 10 employees participated in the theft of property, says Micrsoft, but the lawsuit is directed only at the company and its owners.

It's becoming pretty clear that Microsoft isn't willing to accept it software, especially when it comes to such a large evasion of software licenses and is taking legal action against pirates.

Windows is still one of the company's most pirated products, but since Office is quite expensive, the losses from the counterfeit copies of the suite are significantly higher.

iGuRu.gr The Best Technology Site in Greecefgns

every publication, directly to your inbox

Join the 2.086 registrants.

Written by Dimitris

Dimitris hates on Mondays .....

Leave a reply

Your email address is not published. Required fields are mentioned with *

Your message will not be published if:
1. Contains insulting, defamatory, racist, offensive or inappropriate comments.
2. Causes harm to minors.
3. It interferes with the privacy and individual and social rights of other users.
4. Advertises products or services or websites.
5. Contains personal information (address, phone, etc.).