Microsoft: FBI information within 45 ′ about Charlie Hebdo

While the French government continues its investigation into the case , more information is being leaked about how he got to the other suspects allegedly involved in the terrorist attacks. As part of the investigation, Microsoft was asked to hand over the details of two of his accounts , which were allegedly used by the attackers.
Charlie Hebdo

It took just 45 minutes to give Microsoft access to the FBI on these two Outlook accounts, as Microsoft lawyer Brad Smith said in statements he made about Charlie Hebdo in Brussels.

It's proof that companies and governments can work seamlessly together, he added, pointing out that there's no problem disclosing details from a user in the absence of a valid court order.

According to a report by the LA Times, Smith revealed the collaboration between Microsoft and the French government on Charlie Hebdo in Brussels, stressing that if the security officials want to have more control over the services of companies, since their requests are covered by laws the disclosure of information is mandatory.

Recall that in 2014, Microsoft was repeatedly accused of cooperating with the NSA. Smith reiterated during his speech that everything should be clearly covered by laws, especially for user data disclosure requests, without affecting public safety and privacy in any way.

"If the government wants to shift the line between security and privacy to the right course, it should do so by changing the law rather than asking us to do it. Democratic societies, not private companies, should decide on the balance between public values ​​such as public security and privacy. "

iGuRu.gr The Best Technology Site in Greeceggns

Get the best viral stories straight into your inbox!















Written by Dimitris

Dimitris hates on Mondays .....

Leave a reply

Your email address is not published. Required fields are mentioned with *

Your message will not be published if:
1. Contains insulting, defamatory, racist, offensive or inappropriate comments.
2. Causes harm to minors.
3. It interferes with the privacy and individual and social rights of other users.
4. Advertises products or services or websites.
5. Contains personal information (address, phone, etc.).