Interesting question, because if we were asked what our favorite Linux distribution is, most of us would have an answer. Most of us have a distribution that stands out as a favorite.
However, it is very rare to find discussions about distros that you don't like. Perhaps because it is so easy to switch from one distro to another. There is rarely a reason to use a distro that you don't like.
Let's mention that every Linux distribution that is created is, like it or not, someone's creative effort. So it seems pointless to reject someone's effort to create, especially when they don't want to make money from it.
Here is the exception to the rule. There are developers, or certain groups, who are intentionally malicious. There are some developers who try to cheat or deceive their users for personal gain.
Unfortunately, there are distributions that include spyware, distributions that are clearly repurposed copies of existing projects with developers asking for donations, or that require users to purchase and install some super duper software.
To avoid being rude, I won't mention such distributions. But I can suggest which distributions are reliable, secure, and worth considering.
Problematic distributions are usually developed by a single developer or at most by small teams.
Distributions with more developers, those operating in the mainstream, have too many eyes on them to get involved in suspicious actions.
George is still wondering what he is doing here….
All distributions provide paid technical support from their manufacturers. Only temple os provided free support. But that's another story
So Zorin OS, which also has a paid version, isn't good?