WikiLeaks and CIA hacking: E ​​and?

iGuRu.gr > WikiLeaks and CIA hacking: E ​​and?

In the wake of the leaked CIA documents from WikiLeaks, which show through 8.000 + internal secret service intelligence documents all (?) The kinds of hacking used by American spies, what has changed in the world of security?

Contrary to Snowden's documents, which shocked the world so much, the interest of the online community does not seem to be the same. On Snowden, months later, even those who were not interested in technology, they read the news with awe, realizing for the first time how much their personal life was exposed.WikiLeaks

See more articles from iGuRu.gr when you search for news on Google.
recommended source on Google

But let's look at things a little more "realistically."

First of all, the CIA is an intelligence service that tries to get every piece of information in any way. The CIA just does what the Russians, the Chinese, the British Intelligence Service and many others do. If they were not looking for or buying zero-day, violating iPhones of foreign agents inside and outside the US, then they would not do their job properly.

On the other hand, maintaining security remains as important this week as it was last week and all other weeks before WikiLeaks leaks, we all agree that our information needs to be secure.

Despite WikiLeaks claims that the CIA may bypass encrypted messaging applications, secret service has not broken the applications themselves but the operating systems. Encryption was not broken, but it was bypassed.

Do not be wrong, even so these hacking techniques are real, there are results and the CIA uses them. But it is not something that was not expected.

Companies that "heard" their name as Open Whisper Systems, developed by Signal, said complacently that this shows how their efforts are rewarded.

"End-to-end encryption is pushing intelligence services to bypass it using targeted attacks."

"The story is not whether Signal or WhatsApp are vulnerable. We see it as a confirmation that what we are doing works. ”

Below is an excerpt from our post-Snowden publication.

____________________________________________

More than a month we have been reading publications about US secret service operations, or to tell us, one of the secret services of USA. At first the reactions were numb, rather we were trying to figure out the size. And I mention the size because I do not believe there is anyone in our readership to believe that the US did not dig something with a global medium of communication that has been established so much in recent years.

Immediately after the first shock, the reactions started, while new information arrived. All the big Internet companies that increase the main (if not all) volume of the traffic, had allied themselves with the spy programs of USA.

Η Microsoft, η Apple The GoogleThe Yahoo and who knows how many others, gave open access to the NSA to facilitate their high work. Watch what our conversations, with our loved ones, sorry NSA I'm not a terrorist.

Immediately after the overthrow, the denials came. Have you honestly expected any of the above companies to take responsibility? I do not think. But it does not stop here.

In the following period, press reports were presented Yahoo has sued in the US because it never wanted to watch its customers.

However, this publication was submitted 2-3 days after that  Edward Snowden revealed the company's actions. Random?

Immediately after, there follows a publication that shows Yahoo almost regretfully saying that "after that we do not take your trust". Very diplomatically accepted acceptance! You may think too much. like let's say "Yahoo will now try to win our trust" with what that means.

The big and innocent Google followed. And she filed a lawsuit seeking the clarification of her name, who for so many years watches her as an eye pupil. You want to blame Google for keeping track of its users ... It was not new.

Then came her sudden decision to ensure the confidentiality of her users' data by changing her encryption.WikiLeaks

Eventually, perhaps all of Snowden's statements, documented by NSA documents, may be all fairy tales and the only true thing in this case is that companies, always trying altruistically, can help us.

But since good sarcasm, but truth, seems to be on the opposite side of the river, we probably have a responsibility too. Everybody involved in the technology knows that there are no secrets on the Internet. OR NSA did exactly what they were ordered to do.

But we were not ordered to use us Skype or WhatsappOr gmail, Mac OS X ή Windows. And of course I blame myself that while I know the action of Google and every Google I continue to use gmail.

H ecosystemThe Apple The Google, And the Yahoo they will never say they have allied with the secret services, because this will cost financially and not only.

And if they say or change ever, they can not ensure that they will not repeat it in the future, especially when things are quiet.

___________________________________

After all that has been preceded, what has changed? Has a court ruled against the NSA, or have the secret services stopped doing their job? Did they stop vulnerabilities? Or is there anyone who thinks it's safe on the Internet?

In our previous release, we said we would be safe until the next Snowden, and it seems the time has come.

Let's discuss it a little more until it is forgotten… ..


Google preferences

giorgos
on13/03/2017 08:04

Leave a Comment

Your email address is not published. Required fields are mentioned with *

Your message will not be published if:
1. Contains insulting, defamatory, racist, offensive or inappropriate comments.
2. Causes harm to minors.
3. It interferes with the privacy and individual and social rights of other users.
4. Advertises products or services or websites.
5. Contains personal information (address, phone, etc.).


Read Next