anon masks

Anonyous was accused of hypocrisy by The Telegraph

On 6 November, one day after the protest Mask March held around the world, Martha Gill from Telegraph  with a publication of her stated that the masks worn by the members of κατασκιάζονται  απ' ότι φαίνεται από που δεν σέβονται τα δικαιώματα των υπαλλήλων τους στις αναπτυσσόμενες χώρες.

anon masks

Gill stressed that Anonymous are hypocrites. "It simply came to our notice then Time Warner, the copyright holder for "V for Vendetta", wins for each mask sold.

Apart from the fact that masks seem to be scandalized by companies that use workers as slaves and this is against what Anonymous represents.

Anonymous of course replied to Gill that the offending is not unfair.

"The truth is, the factory that makes them is actually a 55-year-old family craft, where artists produce an estimated 200.000 masks a year," the hacktivists said.

"Most of them were designed by Catalan artist Sergi Arbusa y Amoros and sold for the annual Brazilian Carnival, which is attended by more than 3 million people in Rio de Janeiro each year."

"Honestly, it is sad that a photo of dark-skinned people in the workplace is directly linked to forced labor."

The cmι των Anonymous  δηλώνουν πολύ δυσαρεστημένοι με την δημοσίευση της Gill. Οι χακτιβιστές αναφέρουν ότι έχουν προσπαθήσει να επικοινωνήσουν μαζί της, αλλά δεν πήραν απάντηση.

But they admit that Warner Bros. makes a lot of money selling masks. However, they emphasize the fact that @YourAnonNews's Twitter account, one of Anonymous's most important accounts, encouraged participants to Million Mask March not to buy masks.

iGuRu.gr The Best Technology Site in Greecefgns

every publication, directly to your inbox

Join the 2.087 registrants.

Written by giorgos

George still wonders what he's doing here ...

Leave a reply

Your email address is not published. Required fields are mentioned with *

Your message will not be published if:
1. Contains insulting, defamatory, racist, offensive or inappropriate comments.
2. Causes harm to minors.
3. It interferes with the privacy and individual and social rights of other users.
4. Advertises products or services or websites.
5. Contains personal information (address, phone, etc.).