Did the FBI misinterpret Silk Road?

The US law enforcement authorities have discovered where it is Road by finding a vulnerability. So they accessed a server from a non-public route. If some others do the same, h he calls it a felony.silk road

About 18 months ago, 27man Andrew Auernheimer was found guilty of conspiracy when he gained access to servers of Inc without the consent of the company. He was sentenced to 41 months in prison, with a fine and parole.

The federal government recognizes the above as a felony, specifically “unauthorized access under the Electronic Fraud and Abuse Act. That's why we have to wonder if the same logic applies to the FBI, especially when it gained access to the servers of Silk Road on Tor. The government claims to have gained access by following the leaked addresses because the server was not properly configured.

Professor Orin Kerr of George Washington University Law School, he wrote in the blog Volokh Conspiracy, that if Auernheimer was found guilty of unauthorized access, then that FBI is illegal, because he did exactly the same.

Of course we can not know what the end of history will be, as its case Ross Ulbricht administrator of Silk Road, is still on trial. We just wonder if Kerr's reports will affect Ulbricht's defense. THE does it apply to everyone or does “the end justifies the means” apply on a case-by-case basis?

To see how they do with the "windows" in America.

 

iGuRu.gr The Best Technology Site in Greeceggns

Get the best viral stories straight into your inbox!















Written by giorgos

George still wonders what he's doing here ...

Leave a reply

Your email address is not published. Required fields are mentioned with *

Your message will not be published if:
1. Contains insulting, defamatory, racist, offensive or inappropriate comments.
2. Causes harm to minors.
3. It interferes with the privacy and individual and social rights of other users.
4. Advertises products or services or websites.
5. Contains personal information (address, phone, etc.).