The President of the Commission that examines espionage prolettertheirs USA K. Mike rogs against duration of a debate about America's National Security Agency (NSA) last Tuesday made a statement that perfectly explains the biased and convenient logic of the respective governments against the legal violations they practice in the name of "freedom" and "good" for the social group.
The Democratic senator asked his professor American University College of Law, K. Stephen Vladeck for his concerns about the NSA surveillance programs.
Rogers raised his question in this way:
Perhaps the fact that we had no complaints about privacy violations here and 10 years clearly shows that something was done right.
If we try to translate this statement in simple words, using a non-political reason we would read:
There can be no violation protectionof privacy, as long as no one knows that their privacy is being violated.
