Craig Wright: I will move Satco's Bitcoin as proof

The The BBC has published a story which pointed to Craig as the original creator of the Bitcoin digital currency Nakamoto.

 

However, the extremely cautious cryptographic community does not seem to be convinced by Wright's evidence-based techniques given to his media and blog.BitCoin Craig Wright

Read: The Web challenges Craig Wright as the creator of Bitcoin

So Craig Wright promised to provide more evidence to convince him that he is behind the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto.

Mrς του Wright δήλωσε στο BBC ότι θα "κινήσει ένα coin από ένα πρώιμο μπλοκ" των Bitcoin που ανήκουν στον Nakamoto" μέσα στις επόμενες ημέρες." Ωστόσο, ο εκπρόσωπος δεν όρισε κάποια .

 

You should be aware that the actual Satoshi Nakamoto, should have access to about 1 million Bitcoins (worth 400 million dollars).

 

These Bitcoins have not been moved for seven whole years since Bitcoin's story began. So if Wright can transfer a part of these Bitcoin to a different address, he will prove possession of the private keys of these Bitcoins and hence his claim that he is Satoshi Nakamoto.

 

Why do they call him a fraudster?

 

Wright to prove his claims provided a cryptographic key like . The key was accompanied by technical information, to convince the crypto community that he is the one behind the Nakamoto alias.

However, the community did not believe Wright's evidence that eventually showed no public information about Nakamoto.

Robert Graham, a well-known security researcher, published an interesting technique on his blog that says one can create a proof like Wright:

 

So the publication "How Craig Wright's Deception Worked"Demonstrates step-by-step how one can create that key he wants.

iGuRu.gr The Best Technology Site in Greecefgns

every publication, directly to your inbox

Join the 2.087 registrants.

Written by Dimitris

Dimitris hates on Mondays .....

Leave a reply

Your email address is not published. Required fields are mentioned with *

Your message will not be published if:
1. Contains insulting, defamatory, racist, offensive or inappropriate comments.
2. Causes harm to minors.
3. It interferes with the privacy and individual and social rights of other users.
4. Advertises products or services or websites.
5. Contains personal information (address, phone, etc.).