Craig Wright: I will move Satco's Bitcoin as proof

The The BBC has published a story which showed Craig Wright as the original creator of the digital coin Bitcoin Satoshi Nakamoto.

 

However, the extremely cautious cryptographic community does not seem to be convinced by Wright's evidence-based techniques given to his media and blog.BitCoin Craig Wright

Read: The Web challenges Craig Wright as the creator of Bitcoin

So Craig Wright promised to provide more evidence to convince him that he is behind the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto.

A Wright spokesman told the BBC he would "move a coin from an early block" of Nakamoto-owned Bitcoin "in the coming days." However, the spokesman did not set a date.

 

You should know that the real Satoshi Nakamoto, should have to about 1 million Bitcoins (worth $400 million).

 

These Bitcoins have not been moved for seven whole years, since the history of Bitcoin begins. So if Wright can transfer a part of said Bitcoin to a different , will prove his possession of the private keys of said Bitcoins and thus his claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto.

 

Why do they call him a fraudster?

 

To prove his claims, Wright provided a cryptographic as proof. The key was accompanied by technical information, to convince the crypto community that he is the one behind the Nakamoto alias.

However, the community did not believe Wright's evidence that eventually showed no public information about Nakamoto.

Ο Graham, a well-known security researcher, posted an interesting technique on his blog that states how one can create a Wright-like proof:

 

So the publication "How Craig Wright's Deception Worked"Demonstrates step-by-step how one can create that key he wants.

iGuRu.gr The Best Technology Site in Greecefgns

every publication, directly to your inbox

Join the 2.087 registrants.

Written by Dimitris

Dimitris hates on Mondays .....

Leave a reply

Your email address is not published. Required fields are mentioned with *

Your message will not be published if:
1. Contains insulting, defamatory, racist, offensive or inappropriate comments.
2. Causes harm to minors.
3. It interferes with the privacy and individual and social rights of other users.
4. Advertises products or services or websites.
5. Contains personal information (address, phone, etc.).